CHRIS SCOTT IS FREE - COVID ORDERS ALL ILLEGAL, INGRAM CHARTER RULING BASED ON ALBERTA GOVERNMENT SUPPLIED MISINFORMATION
Freedom loving Albertans cheered yesterday when the illegal charges against Whistlestop Café Owner Chris Scott were thrown out by the Court.
Notwithstanding this landmark legal outcome the Trudeau propaganda mouthpieces at CBC and other Trudeau “chest feeding” legacy media outlets like Global and CTV all breathlessly reported that Justice Romaine would have found the patently unlawful Public Health Act Kenney/Hinshaw Orders to be “constitutional” IF they weren’t so illegal.
What none of these so called urinalists thought to report on is that every conclusion reached by Justice Romaine on the “reasonableness” of the measures taken was based on obvious misinformation fed to her by so called Alberta Government “experts”
The most glaring piece of misinformation was found in paragraph 335 of the Ingram Decision.
[335] In Dr. Kindrachuk’s opinion:
… reaching herd immunity without vaccines would require somewhere here between 50-90% of the population to get infected. At Alberta’s population of 4.4 million. This would equate to roughly 2.2 to 4 million people infected. Using a conservative death rate of 1%, this would equate to 22,000 – 40,000 deaths.
[336] The up to 40,000 deaths Dr. Kindrachuk described did not include the number of people who would likely die as patients would be unable to access the overwhelmed healthcare system.
This key finding is based on a “doctor” of micro-chemistry who got on the COVID government “expert witness” gravy train by co-authoring papers on “virology”. Kindrachuk, a Manitoba COVID huckster who testified in the Gateway Case, convinced Justice Romaine to prefer his third hand hearsay evidence of 1% Mortality Rates over the evidence of Stanford Medical Professor, MD, epidemiologist, esteemed public health economist, and ACTUAL MEDICAL DOCTOR Jay Bhattacharya. Every criticism that Justice Romaine made of Dr. Bhattacharya’s evidence could have applied exponentially to the ludicrous misinformation promulgated by Kindrachuk.
The finding of Justice Romaine on the overwhelmed health care system was never in evidence and appears to have been created out of judicial red cloth face mask material as it was never in evidence before the court.
As anyone who paid the least bit of attention during the COVID phony public health mis-management crisis knows, the death rates in Alberta NEVER came close to 1%. In fact, in key demographics <18, <55, <65 without substantial comorbidities the death rate for COVID was substantially lower than the rates of serious vaccine injury and was orders of magnitude off of the 1% number found by Justice Romaine as the entire justification for her finding that she would have found the Orders to be constitutional if they weren’t so glaringly illegal.
The issue with the acceptance of the “1% Solution” is that Justice Romaine completely ignored AHS data that was in evidence before the court that completely disproved Kindrachuk’s ridiculous if not fraudulent claim that COVID Mortality should be calculated using a “conservative death rate of 1%”. Perhaps in fairness to Kindrachuk and the NDP supporting COVID alarmists who endorsed the 1% “conservative death rate” was that this was simply wishful thinking on their part in that they would have liked 1% of Conservatives to die from COVID prior to sending Rachel back to swilling Chardonnay through a straw in the last election.
The real issue now facing Premier Smith is what to do with the AHS bureaucrats and government lawyers who knowingly perverted the truth and fed misinformation to the Court and to the voters of Alberta in furtherance of a communist dictatorship in Alberta under the guise of “public health”.
Every AHS doctor and bureaucrat paid hundreds of thousands of dollars annually and was party to this fraud needs to be fired. Every Alberta Government Lawyer and AHS lawyer who fed glaring “public health” misinformation to the Court in furtherance of these immoral and illegal orders needs to be fired. An investigation needs to be carried out, the perpetrators need to be identified and they need to be run out of Government or the Public Health establishment on a rail.
On a somewhat comical note, one of my best memories of the Ingram Trial was the day that we cross examined a government “expert” on the benefit of porous cloth COVID masks. Every day prior to that Justice Romaine Appeared in Court in what I can only imagine the “In” crowd of Justices thought was the Judicial fashion statement of wearing a red cloth mask that matched the trim on her judicial robes. Following the witness being asked to acknowledge that given the size of a COVID molecule, a cloth mask would be less effective against COVID than a chain link fence stopping a handful of sand, the Learned Justice appeared in court that afternoon wearing an N-95 Mask. Yet we are asked to believe that people so apparently afraid of a jumped-up cold virus could rule on issues of such grave public importance without bias.
In the future trials such as this should only be held by a jury of Citizens of Alberta not afraid to leave their homes without fear of contracting a virus with a mortality rate among the healthy approaching zero.
Jeffrey R.W. Rath, B.A. (Hons.), LL.B. (Hons.)
Foothills, Alberta
29th of August, 2023